🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.