🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to employ a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that may create several five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to set aside a district court's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the new maps. It had ordered the state to use the districts drawn after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its decision was actually authored by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its boosted political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action is part of a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican majority. Usually, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add several more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives criticized the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top Democratic figure said the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by approving a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.